Nick Turchiaro-Imagn Images

Jets’ Scott Arniel reveals ‘hard’ part of Connor Hellebuyck not starting in Devils clash appeared first on ClutchPoints. Add ClutchPoints as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

The Winnipeg Jets will welcome the New Jersey Devils to Canada Life Centre on Tuesday night for the first time since the Connor Hellebuyck trade — but almost inexplicably, the 33-year-old will not be between the pipes for the contest.

Visit grenadier.co.za for more information.

Instead, the Devils will turn to Jake Allen, while Hellebuyck, who spent the first 11 years of his career in Manitoba, will watch from the bench.

The decision has drawn sharp criticism from across the hockey world, and Jets head coach Scott Arniel chimed in on Monday.

Watch sports LIVE with fuboTV (free trial)

“It goes back to the ownership, it goes back to the fans, it goes back to the core guys that have been with Helly from the very beginning, who he kind of left on,” the bench boss told reporters, per TSN.

“That’s the part for me that’s hard, he just gave up on us, and so it would be nice to just finally be done with this. All it does is drag it out 10 or nine more games from now, we’re going to have to start into it and talk about it again here. That’s the biggest disappointment.”

Jets head coach Scott Arniel shares his thoughts on Connor Hellebuyck not starting in his return to Winnipeg. pic.twitter.com/fSBrsqTvRl

— TSN (@TSN_Sports) November 9, 2026

The Jets and Devils will play for the second and final time in 2026-27 on Nov. 28 in Newark.

New Jersey general manager Sunny Mehta announced the decision Sunday, and Hellebuyck also shared his thoughts, saying he was disappointed he wouldn’t be starting.

“We definitely had a conversation and I told them my thoughts on it and they told me theirs, and at the end of the day I have to listen to them and I can only push so hard,” Hellebuyck said. “I can only push so hard. I was adamant that I want to play, but it is what it is.”

Mehta said that starting Hellebuyck on Tuesday “would potentially give us a reduction in our expected win probability,” an explanation that has drawn widespread criticism.

Hellebuyck is 5-0-0 with a 1.96 goals-against average and .913 save percentage with the Devils, and he just shut out the Toronto Maple Leafs on Sunday.

Meanwhile, Allen sports a 3.20 goals-against average and .881 save percentage.

It’s a bad look for the Devils, who should have let Hellebuyck face the music and move on. Instead, they’ve prolonged the storyline until the teams meet again at the end of the month — with no guarantee he’ll start that game, either.

Read full story at source

Clawfinger, an infamous rock band from the 90s, refuses to perform one of its biggest songs these days. Their singer explains why they made that decision, and I, for one, wholeheartedly support the decision to leave this one in the past.

Visit betsport24.es for more information.

Hailing from Sweden, Clawfinger is a rap-metal band that dropped their debut album, Dead Dumb Blind, in 1993. The very first track on that record is titled “N****r,” and yes, it’s exactly the n-word you think it is. Listening to the lyrics, the song feels like it’s discouraging use of the word while also using it so, so, so much.

It is quite the conundrum, because the song is also one of their most popular. Right now, on Spotify alone, that song has more than 7.5 million streams. However, any fans who actually want to hear the song live should not hold their breath.

During a recent interview on the IMPACT Metal Channel, Clawfinger frontman Zak Tell was asked if he thinks Clawfinger would ever perform the song again. “I do not know,” he replied. “Times have changed since we released that song. There’s a whole new wokeness, and people are a lot more aware.”

One of Clawfinger’s biggest hits is a condemnation of racism with a very controversial title

He then mentioned the “Black Lives Matter” movement and offered some additional context on why the band doesn’t play the song. “I think one of the problems today is that things get taken out of context,” Tell said. “Nobody cares about the big picture; nobody cares about background. People get stuck up on words and small things instead of seeing the big picture.”

“I mean, we’re totally fine with the song,” he continued. “We know what we stand for. We know we’re not a bunch of racist idiots. The problem is everyone else out there who doesn’t know.”

Tell lamented that a “10-second TikTok clip” featuring only the “chorus” creates a misconception of the song. “It gets taken totally out of context,” he said. “I think it creates more problems than it creates solutions. And also it’s about being respectful to the fact that the times have changed, and people do see things differently. And maybe it’s a topic that’s more important than a three-and-a-half-minute song. It deserves to be addressed properly.

“Maybe we shouldn’t be the people addressing it anymore, if we ever should have been. But maybe now and here is not our time and place to be the agitators,” Tell added. “It’s not really our job to educate people about it, I feel.

“So it’s mostly just out of being respectful that we chose not to play it anymore,” Tell concluced. “Not because we don’t believe it’s a good song, ’cause we do. But it’s not our time and place anymore, the way the world is now. Maybe in the future that’ll change and people will understand the bigger picture more, and realize that it’s okay to say basically anything, as long as your intentions are good. But I don’t see the world working that way right now. Unfortunately.”

Photo by Mick Hutson/Redferns

The post ’90s Rock Band Refuses to Perform One of Its Biggest Songs, Singer Explains Why appeared first on VICE.

Read full story at source